I wonder if Apple went with the S1 SIP to permit upgrades to the Apple Watch over time? It would go a long way to answering questions about obsolescence and longevity.
Friday, January 9, 2015
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
UPDATE: iOS app privacy
How does a Google or Microsoft iOS app know that I have other Google or Microsoft apps installed on my iOS device? For example, if I download and install Chrome (after having, perhaps Google Maps installed and myself logged in), I am greeted with to offer to sign in - and Chrome already knows my Google ID. Similarly, if I download Word, log-in, and then download Excel, Excel already knows my Microsoft ID.
This is surprising as it means the apps have access to both a list of my existing apps (I think this is okay but not ideal) as well as my user ID (huh?). Is it possible for me to write an app that can: (i) determine a user's Google ID; and (ii) ask the user to log in and thus give me credentials? (i) alone seems bad, (ii) is very bad.
Also, noting that I do not even need to provide a password to confirm to Chrome that I am myself, is there some serious security lapse here?
All very odd
UPDATE: Is this related? http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/06/24/apple-expanding-user-privacy-will-prevent-ios-apps-from-seeing-other-installed-apps. It's not completely the same (as this seems narrower than knowing my Google ID and Microsoft ID). But perhaps part of the same framework?
This is surprising as it means the apps have access to both a list of my existing apps (I think this is okay but not ideal) as well as my user ID (huh?). Is it possible for me to write an app that can: (i) determine a user's Google ID; and (ii) ask the user to log in and thus give me credentials? (i) alone seems bad, (ii) is very bad.
Also, noting that I do not even need to provide a password to confirm to Chrome that I am myself, is there some serious security lapse here?
All very odd
UPDATE: Is this related? http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/06/24/apple-expanding-user-privacy-will-prevent-ios-apps-from-seeing-other-installed-apps. It's not completely the same (as this seems narrower than knowing my Google ID and Microsoft ID). But perhaps part of the same framework?
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Apple and high defensibility
There are lots of reasonable questions about iPad's growth and future. Nevertheless, this article makes a nice argument that Apple has enough of a lead in the space and, more importantly, a sustainable advantage in processors, to continue to earn profits and improve the product without obvious near-term risks or competition in its high end space. This is a direct result of Apple's vertical integration and, as a corollary, having a proprietary source of supply for chips. Whether or not there is some enormous use case of the iPad is still somewhat unknown (to be clear, it is a big business even if people have difficulty articulating exactly why it is better than alternative formats), at least there is time for Apple, its customers, and its developers to figure it out.
Even more interestingly, the article notes that this processor independence makes a strong case for AppleTV and AppleWatch. In brief, as Apple works to bring general computing to different places, it can stake out a high and differentiated ground using hardware (processor) and software (OSX/iOS) advantages unlike anyone else. It is not the idea of vertical integration as a defensive strategy that is interesting; it is the fact that no one else seems to be trying this (at least successfully).
Even more interestingly, the article notes that this processor independence makes a strong case for AppleTV and AppleWatch. In brief, as Apple works to bring general computing to different places, it can stake out a high and differentiated ground using hardware (processor) and software (OSX/iOS) advantages unlike anyone else. It is not the idea of vertical integration as a defensive strategy that is interesting; it is the fact that no one else seems to be trying this (at least successfully).
Friday, October 24, 2014
Economic Growth
A reasonable NYT article on economic growth (in particular, growth in China) but relevant on a variety of fronts.
There is one aspect that sticks out. The article (and cited sources) suggest that growth reverts to the mean and that superior growth will inevitably decline over time. And notes that the USSR and Japan were both expected to surpass the US but never did. This seems to gloss over the US's high growth over a long period.
My thumbnail view on growth, in particular, growth in the US:
1) huge natural endowment;
2) significant immigration and high birth rate; and
3) most importantly, strong property rights and rule of law.
#1 helped to give a head start and encourage #2 but, ultimately, it is #2 and #3 that allowed above trend growth to continue. As a nice example, see the eventual stumbling of the USSR and Japan for #3 and #2, respectively (notwithstanding the large #1 of USSR).
There is one aspect that sticks out. The article (and cited sources) suggest that growth reverts to the mean and that superior growth will inevitably decline over time. And notes that the USSR and Japan were both expected to surpass the US but never did. This seems to gloss over the US's high growth over a long period.
My thumbnail view on growth, in particular, growth in the US:
1) huge natural endowment;
2) significant immigration and high birth rate; and
3) most importantly, strong property rights and rule of law.
#1 helped to give a head start and encourage #2 but, ultimately, it is #2 and #3 that allowed above trend growth to continue. As a nice example, see the eventual stumbling of the USSR and Japan for #3 and #2, respectively (notwithstanding the large #1 of USSR).
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Apple Pay and Target
Someone at Target is not paying attention.
Target revised its iOS app to let shoppers use Apple Pay to buy on-line. However, they neglected to work with their bank partner/issuer (TD Bank, I think) to allow their own store branded Visa card to be registered with Apple Pay. I know Target can't direct their partner and that Target is not that interested in the Visa card at this point, but one would think they could cajole TD and/or delay the adoption of Apple Pay until they could avoid this conspicuous gap. This is on top of not being able to use Apple Pay at the register (which is understandable as Target has not yet installed NFC devices at the register).
Target revised its iOS app to let shoppers use Apple Pay to buy on-line. However, they neglected to work with their bank partner/issuer (TD Bank, I think) to allow their own store branded Visa card to be registered with Apple Pay. I know Target can't direct their partner and that Target is not that interested in the Visa card at this point, but one would think they could cajole TD and/or delay the adoption of Apple Pay until they could avoid this conspicuous gap. This is on top of not being able to use Apple Pay at the register (which is understandable as Target has not yet installed NFC devices at the register).
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Starr vs US regarding AIG
Article in the NYT about the Starr suit against the federal government.
It would truly be wonderful if we saw some evenhanded coverage that showed exactly what the government did and did wrong when it used AIG's value to bail-out much of wall street. Even if the actions were necessary to preserve the financial system, it doesn't mean that AIG shareholders should have uniquely borne so much of the burden of those actions.
The use of AIG as a conduit to make other parts of the financial system whole was a panicked reaction by the government to the crisis. Taking the government at face value that there was no malice does not justify the use of government powers to act so inequitably. Some recompense is appropriate.
The following statement from the NYT article captures what I have been writing for years:
It would truly be wonderful if we saw some evenhanded coverage that showed exactly what the government did and did wrong when it used AIG's value to bail-out much of wall street. Even if the actions were necessary to preserve the financial system, it doesn't mean that AIG shareholders should have uniquely borne so much of the burden of those actions.
The use of AIG as a conduit to make other parts of the financial system whole was a panicked reaction by the government to the crisis. Taking the government at face value that there was no malice does not justify the use of government powers to act so inequitably. Some recompense is appropriate.
The following statement from the NYT article captures what I have been writing for years:
The decision to use taxpayer and A.I.G. money to repurchase soured mortgage deals that the company insured for big banks in the form of credit-default swaps amounted to a “backdoor bailout” of Wall Street, the lawsuit says.
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Touch ID and Mac
I wonder why Apple has not brought Touch ID to the Mac to help in password management. I know typing in passwords is faster on a keyboard and that safari can be set up to automatically enter passwords but still, simple identity verification seems like it would be useful. Maybe this is an example of less is more and just saying no.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)